Why Our Relationship with Everything Has Become Distorted?

I have spent hours pondering how the world around us exerts a profound influence on the way we relate to people, objects, and even our own identities. There is a particular pattern I have come to notice : the intersection of capitalism, moral judgments, and social signaling has grown so pervasive that our relationships — with each other, with our communities, and with ourselves — often seem warped. By “warped,” I refer to how these relationships are nudged, contorted, or entirely transformed by incentives that we may not fully perceive, yet still feel compelled to follow. These forces operate like currents beneath the surface, carrying us along whether or not we explicitly consent.

In this essay, I aim to explore how this distortion arises, how it reshapes our inner worlds, and what might be done to recognize or even mitigate it. I will draw from both philosophical insights and scientific perspectives, weaving these threads into a broader narrative that shows the complexity of our situation. My hope is that by examining these forces — capitalism, morality, and social signaling — we can better understand why our relationships have taken on their current form and consider how we might engage with greater clarity and authenticity.

The Distortive Force of Capitalism

I notice that capitalism, at its core, extends far beyond an economic model. It has become a social and cultural reality that frames nearly every aspect of life. Although capitalism is typically defined by features like private ownership, market competition, and the pursuit of profit, its reach extends deep into how we form relationships and how we see ourselves. One way I see this is in the commodification of nearly all experiences. In everyday life, we are not only buying and selling goods; we also monetize our time, talents, and even our personal identities. I catch myself, for instance, unconsciously evaluating whether a skill or pastime could be “marketable.” Work infiltrates the domain of the personal and emotional, creating a sense that every aspect of life should yield some measurable return.

This mindset can produce a constant pressure : to remain “productive,” to see every interaction as a potential “networking opportunity,” and to treat personal relationships as quasi-contractual engagements. While people have always relied on one another for survival and support, there is now a distinctly economic cast to these interactions that goes beyond mutual help. We talk about “emotional labor” in friendships, “investment returns” in professional connections, and “value-added” experiences in our everyday choices. Philosophical critiques of economic life often point out how labor becomes alienated from the laborer. Yet I see that it is not only work performed in a job that becomes alienated. Even leisure and play can be rendered into digital or social capital — amplified in the form of curated social media posts, likes, and followers. In effect, our most human expressions risk being measured by how well they align with market-driven or attention-driven metrics.

There is, of course, nothing inherently wrong with exchanging services, valuing skill sets, or wanting fair compensation. The distortion emerges when these capitalist logics become the default lens through which we see ourselves and each other. An artist’s painting is no longer just an expression of creativity but also a commodity to be sold; a dinner with a friend might turn into a stage for forging professional ties rather than a moment of genuine connection. This subtle infiltration into intimate areas of life is part of what I find so troubling : it dilutes the intrinsic joy, spontaneity, and authenticity of our relationships.

The Interplay of Morality

Morality, in the sense of shared notions of right and wrong, is another factor that can distort our relationships. Moral codes often serve a critical purpose — fostering trust, cooperation, and social cohesion. Great philosophical traditions throughout history have attempted to refine these moral codes to help individuals and societies live in harmony. However, in many contemporary contexts, morality is not merely a guide but a social tool. It can become a means of assessing others’ worth or defending the moral high ground, especially when intertwined with capitalist values.

For instance, companies sometimes label their goods as “ethical” or “sustainable,” appealing to a moral sensibility and often charging higher prices in return. While there is often a genuine basis for such movements (for example, to reduce environmental harm or ensure fair labor practices), the marketplace can transform these moral stands into forms of signaling or status-seeking. Consumers may buy these products not only for the inherent good but also as a way to broadcast their moral or ethical superiority. This leads me to question whether the moral impetus behind a purchase is genuine concern or a desire for social acclaim. Furthermore, capitalism’s link with morality can stigmatize individuals who do not appear to be “contributing” through work. I recall how society labels the unemployed or those in precarious jobs as lazy or of lower character, conflating economic status with moral standing. This conflation is so widespread that we may not immediately notice it, yet it feeds judgments that undermine empathy and compassion. People become blameworthy if they fail to meet certain productivity standards, even if the structural conditions of the economy itself create unemployment or exploit certain forms of labor.

Moral frameworks can also be weaponized to police behaviors. Rather than inspiring genuine ethical reflection or dialogue, they become instruments for condemnation or social exclusion. There is a subtle shift from morality as a deep personal orientation — one that involves constant self-reflection and empathy — toward morality as a mechanism for shaming those who are not “on board” with sanctioned viewpoints. Thus, a potential good is twisted into a rigid structure for enforcing social conformity.

The Role of Social Signaling

Social signaling is yet another potent force shaping our relationships. By social signaling, I refer to the ways in which we communicate status, identity, and belonging through our behaviors, possessions, and public stances. It is almost impossible to step outside the realm of social signaling entirely because it is rooted in human nature : historically, belonging to a group was often necessary for survival. Signals help define who is “in” and who is “out,” who is trustworthy and who is not. In modern society, however, the capacity for signaling is enhanced by technology, mass communication, and consumer culture. The rise of social media intensifies this urge by allowing us to track and quantify social approval through likes, shares, and comments. I find that many of my own impulses — what I wear, what I post, what I praise or criticize — carry a dual weight : the personal meaning and the public signal.

On one hand, social signaling can be beneficial. It lets me connect with people who share my values, offers a sense of community around shared interests, and can even galvanize collective action around important social causes. On the other hand, the incessant urge to display certain aspects of the self can foster a sense of performance. Activities and relationships become curated exhibitions of identity, sometimes overshadowing genuine engagement.

When capitalism, morality, and social signaling converge, the effect can be suffocating. For instance, the consumption of ethically-branded products not only satisfies a moral impulse but also broadcasts virtue in social networks, which can bolster one’s reputation. Companies, in turn, exploit that desire for affirmation by marketing the moral dimension of their goods, using it as a selling point. Meanwhile, individuals publicly affirm moral positions, spurred in part by a subconscious sense that it will elevate their social standing. Over time, this can lead to a profound sense of alienation. I might lose track of whether my opinions and actions emerge from a sincere understanding or merely from a desire to stay consistent with a socially approved identity. That alienation is a hallmark of the distortion, obscuring my authentic relationships even from my own awareness.

Our Inner World

These external pressures — capitalist logic, moral judgment, and social signaling — can profoundly reshape my inner life. Self-perception, joy, and mental well-being are all affected. I often see the following patterns :

• Objectification of the Self and Others : Instead of seeing people as multidimensional beings, there is a subtle push to view them in terms of their utility or moral and social value. Even my own traits and experiences can be treated as marketable assets or moral credentials. Over time, this perspective can degrade the depth and richness of human connections.
• Erosion of Spontaneous Enjoyment : There is a sense that I must always be “on,” ensuring every action aligns with some larger narrative of success or virtue. This scrutiny can strip away the capacity to experience spontaneity, as I may wonder how an activity or relationship appears to others or how it contributes to my “personal brand.”
• Anxiety and Competition : Because economic, moral, and social metrics are always in flux, a pervasive anxiety can take hold. Am I productive enough? Morally consistent enough? Popular enough? The result is a kind of relentless self-monitoring and fear of not measuring up, exacerbated by the constant stream of curated successes we see in others’ lives.
• Shifting Ethical Perception : Morality, especially in online spaces, can spiral into public shaming or “call-outs.” While accountability is sometimes warranted, the collective environment often rewards swift condemnation over thoughtful inquiry. This dynamic does little to foster genuine moral growth and can instead produce an atmosphere of fear and performance.
• Online Connectivity and its Paradoxes : The digital realm magnifies all these tendencies, offering immediate feedback on social signals in the form of likes and reactions. Capitalism thrives there with targeted ads and influencer marketing, while moral outrage cycles come and go at dizzying speed. In that space, it can be challenging to maintain a sense of personal clarity or authentic presence.

These transformations in the inner world are so pervasive that they may feel ordinary. If I never question these currents, I might assume this is just how life is. But when I pause to reflect, the extent of the distortion becomes undeniable.

Philosophical and Scientific Underpinnings

Philosophical perspectives, particularly those critiquing modern social and economic life, help me see how we arrived at this point. Critical theorists have argued that capitalism shapes consciousness by rendering certain modes of thought “common sense,” thereby normalizing competition, commodification, and moralizing productivity. Existentialist philosophy, meanwhile, encourages a recognition of one’s freedom, challenging the assumption that I must passively accept socially constructed norms.

From a scientific angle, evolutionary psychology suggests that our ancestors had good reason to seek social acceptance and avoid ostracism. This survival mechanism manifests today in the form of social signaling. Neurobiological research shows that social approval stimulates reward circuits in the brain, reinforcing behaviors that garner positive recognition. The ongoing interplay between these evolutionary drives and contemporary capitalist incentives can mold our behavior in ways that feel automatic.

Understanding these underpinnings clarifies that the distortion is not a simple matter of choice or failing; it is the product of deeply rooted social structures and innate human tendencies. Nevertheless, the fact that we can become aware of these influences suggests we are not entirely without agency.

Seeing Beyond Distortion

A crucial question arises : how might we step outside or at least see beyond the distortion? One significant step, in my view, is honest self-awareness. When I recognize the forces at play, I can pause and question why I feel the need to perform certain actions or adopt particular stances. I can ask myself : “Am I doing this to signal status or morality, or because it resonates with my genuine beliefs and passions?”

Yet awareness alone is insufficient if my social reality remains the same. Even if I see the patterns, I still live within their constraints. A second step involves experimenting with forms of expression and connection that resist immediate commodification. For example, maintaining a private journal, creating art solely for personal fulfillment, or engaging in hobbies that are not showcased on social media can restore a sense of authentic engagement.

Similarly, I might seek relationships that are grounded in mutual respect and exploration rather than transactional expectations. While economic and social obligations can never be entirely eliminated, there are ways to set boundaries and cultivate friendships or communities where the emphasis lies on intrinsic connection and trust rather than profit or social capital.

From a broader perspective, some people advocate rethinking aspects of the capitalist framework. Ideas like universal basic income, cooperatives, or local exchange systems aim to weaken the grip of profit-driven imperatives on daily life. While these ideas are neither flawless nor immediately realizable at large scales, they reflect an impulse to reduce how harshly economic output determines social value.

Our Relationships

Distortion affects our most intimate relationships. Friends, family members, partners, and colleagues can become entangled in unspoken transactions. These can be subtle : the sense that I owe someone for a favor, the expectation that time together should yield networking opportunities, or the pressure to demonstrate moral worthiness within a group.

I often notice that, despite genuine affection or care, the logic of exchange can create an undercurrent of calculation, an invisible ledger. Morality and social signaling may further complicate matters : I might judge others for not holding the “right” social or political positions, or I might seek out only those relationships that enhance my social standing.

Thankfully, these distortions do not extinguish the possibility for meaningful connection. People can still share vulnerability, laughter, and unconditional support. The challenge lies in remaining vigilant so that capitalist, moralizing, and signaling impulses do not overshadow the deeper purpose of relationships. I want to see the real person before me, not merely a role they might play in a market or moral hierarchy.

Toward a Nuanced Understanding

One danger in critiquing capitalism, morality, and social signaling is the temptation to paint them in purely negative terms. In reality, each has dimensions that can be constructive :

• Capitalism can spur innovation and improve living standards in certain contexts.
• Morality can be the foundation for justice, empathy, and communal well-being.
• Social Signaling can help create solidarity and coordinate group efforts.

Problems arise when these forces intersect in a manner that suppresses our capacity for authenticity, empathy, and genuine moral reasoning. The distortion becomes severe when we cannot tell if we are being driven by honest conviction or by the subtle interplay of social and economic pressures.

I realize this contradiction runs throughout my day-to-day life. The smartphone I use, the clothes I wear, the moral stances I take — each is likely shaped by these three forces. A nuanced understanding means acknowledging that while I am influenced by these systems, I also have opportunities to reflect and choose differently, at least on occasion.

An Invitation to Reflect

The primary aim of these reflections is not to issue a dogmatic call for revolution or a purist stance of moral superiority. Rather, it is an invitation to look critically at why our relationships — whether to one another, to objects, or to our own beliefs — are distorted in the ways they are. Recognizing the complexity of these pressures is the first step toward evaluating how we wish to respond.

I suspect that each individual must confront a version of the same question : “How do I live in a way that aligns with my deeper convictions, while navigating structures and social demands I did not create?” There is no single right answer. Yet the act of asking helps me remain conscious of the fact that I am part of these broader processes without being entirely defined by them.

In practical terms, reflecting might lead to small but meaningful actions. These can include :

• Reevaluating Consumption : Looking at the real reasons I buy certain products, recognizing whether it is genuine need or mere performance.
• Practicing Genuine Morality : Distinguishing between moral posturing and heartfelt efforts to help or support others.
• Adjusting Online Behavior : Reducing the compulsion to post everything, thereby placing less emphasis on external approval.
• Seeking Dialogues and Communities of Inquiry : Engaging with those who also question these dynamics, finding shared support for alternative ways of being.

Even modest acts can reinvigorate my sense of agency, reminding me that I am not merely a puppet of social forces.

Conclusion

In tracing how capitalism, morality, and social signaling collectively distort our relationships, I have come to see that this distortion is pervasive yet not all-encompassing. It arises from a confluence of historical and structural factors, as well as deep-rooted human tendencies. We monetize and moralize personal interactions; we signal status and virtue in hopes of belonging. These behaviors feel natural because they align with the logic of the systems we inhabit and the instincts we have inherited.

Yet it is possible to see this situation for what it is and to respond with intention. By cultivating self-awareness and engaging in thoughtful critique, I begin to peel back the layers of distortion. I also recognize that these powerful forces have positive sides, which can be harnessed without fully capitulating to the distortions.

To live in a way that honors authenticity, creativity, and compassion requires a delicate balance : acknowledging the structural realities of capitalism, the importance of moral values, and the inevitability of social signaling, while maintaining enough distance to keep sight of what truly matters. The more I grapple with these questions, the more convinced I become that change is possible — if not on a grand systemic scale overnight, then at least within the sphere of my own relationships.

Ultimately, these reflections remind me that human beings possess a remarkable capacity for introspection and imagination. We do not have to uncritically accept that everything in our lives must be commodified, moralized, or performed for an audience. We can choose, however imperfectly, to relate to one another in ways that honor our shared humanity. Such a choice, repeated collectively, may spark new forms of connection that transcend some of our current constraints. In this pursuit lies the hope of reclaiming a more authentic and grounded relationship with each other and with the world at large.

Thanks for dropping by !

---

Disclaimer : Everything written above, I owe to the great minds I've encountered and the voices I’ve heard along the way.