Product Design : The Confluence of Beauty, Thought, and Interaction

I’ve always been fascinated by the intangible qualities that make a product stand out — its “feeling,” the effortless way it might nestle into my hands, or the subtle delight its interfaces spark in me when I first open it. Over time, this fascination evolved from a passing curiosity into an intense interrogation of why some designs resonate so deeply and others do not. My quest for answers led me to immerse myself in philosophy and cognitive science, in addition to more practical explorations of industrial design, user experience, and human-computer interaction (HCI). In this post, I want to share my thoughts — both philosophical and pragmatic — on how product design and aesthetics intertwine, and why understanding these intersections is crucial for shaping present and future interfaces. In doing so, I’ll draw on a broad intellectual heritage : Immanuel Kant’s reflections on aesthetic judgment, Edmund Burke’s (often spelled as Bruce, though recognized in philosophical discourse as Burke) perspectives on the sublime and the beautiful, David Hume’s ideas on taste and sentiment, and George Berkeley’s meditations on perception. Let's dive in...

The Soul of a Product : Why Beauty Matters

When I first began thinking about product design in earnest, I felt that there was a dimension of design that could not be captured by mere functionality. Conventional wisdom sometimes suggests that if a product solves a user’s problem efficiently, that’s all that truly matters. Yet I sensed that something deeper was at play. As I tested prototypes, studied user feedback, and followed the gut reactions of colleagues and mentors, I recognized an invisible undercurrent : beauty — or something akin to it — was playing an outsized role in how users felt about a product.

Kant on the Disinterested Pleasure of the Beautiful

My initial intellectual pivot was toward Immanuel Kant. Kant’s Critique of Judgment articulates a remarkable idea of beauty as that which we experience in a mode of “disinterested pleasure.” In other words, when I regard an object (a painting, a sculpture, or even a well-designed smartphone), there is a special form of aesthetic delight that stands apart from my direct practical concerns. I may value a smartphone for its features — its camera’s resolution, battery life, or the sleekness of its software. But, in a purely aesthetic sense, I can also experience a pleasure that does not rely on how those features impact me pragmatically. It’s almost as if a part of me steps back and admires something universal in the form or the arrangement of the object’s elements.

In product design, this “disinterested pleasure” doesn’t necessarily mean ignoring functionality. Rather, it highlights the dimension of design that can evoke admiration independent of functionality. I recall the first time I held a meticulously engineered piece of hardware — like the original unibody MacBook, for instance. Even when I had no intention of using it at that moment, I found myself drawn to its weight, the finish of the aluminum, and the gentle curves along the edges. It was a quiet, contemplative form of delight, reminiscent of Kant’s aesthetic judgment, unburdened (for a few seconds, at least) by the utilitarian aspects of the device.

Edmund Burke on the Sublime and Beautiful

Kant’s notion of disinterested pleasure resonated deeply with me, but I still felt something more dynamic and powerful might be lurking in certain designs — especially those that break boundaries or evoke awe in the user. Turning to Edmund Burke, I found that his distinction between the sublime and the beautiful gave me a broader vocabulary to understand why some products — or experiences — felt almost overwhelming in their intensity. Burke wrote about the sublime as something that evokes a kind of astonishment or even terror, while the beautiful tends to be pleasing and harmonious.

In modern product design, I see the sublime often emerging in radical innovations — think of the first time you put on a well-crafted virtual reality headset or experience the effortless automation of a cutting-edge AI feature. There’s a sense of boundlessness, a momentary shock that we’re crossing into new frontiers. Meanwhile, the beautiful is found in those subtle, harmonious details that simply feel “right” and balanced — a user interface that hides complexity behind a gentle gradient, a keyboard that satisfies with the perfect tactile click, or a meticulously thought-through gesture control that flows intuitively with your hand movements.

What Burke’s philosophy illuminated for me is the dual nature of aesthetic experiences in design : products can be beautiful in their coherence and unity, yet occasionally sublime when they evoke wonder at the human imagination’s ability to transcend perceived limits. Designers often juggle these two impulses — keeping an experience approachable while also invoking a sense of the extraordinary.

The Architecture of Human-Computer Interaction : Cognitive and Philosophical Underpinnings

Hume on Taste and Subjective Experience

If we pivot from the purely aesthetic dimension to the user’s subjective experience, David Hume’s explorations of taste and sentiment come naturally into focus. Hume famously argued that judgments of beauty are grounded in sentiment. That is, if I claim that a particular device is “beautiful,” I’m fundamentally expressing a subjective feeling — one that might resonate with you if we share similar sensibilities, or one that might not if our sensibilities diverge.

What matters here for HCI is that user experience is irreducibly personal. Yes, we can measure usability metrics, run A/B tests, and rely on heuristics to refine our designs. But at the end of the day, the intangible sense that a product feels “right” or “delightful” is generated by the user’s subjective experience. This is both empowering and intimidating for a designer : it means that we can’t simply rely on a universal formula for aesthetic success. Instead, we calibrate our designs to meet or inspire the sentiments of our target audience. We rely on empathy, emotional intelligence, and the capacity to read cultural contexts to shape these experiences.

I’ve found that this interpretive flexibility demands a careful balancing act. Some users love minimalist interfaces with few distractions; others find them cold or too stark. Hume’s reminder that taste is subjective doesn’t mean we throw up our hands and say “it’s all relative,” but rather that we invest more in dialogue with users. We listen carefully to the emotional responses our designs elicit, acknowledging that there can be no monolithic standard for beauty or usability. We test, iterate, and glean patterns — but never lose sight of the individual’s voice in the crowd of data.

Berkeley on Perception : “Esse Est Percipi” and Interface Realities

Another philosopher who left a large footprint in my reflections on HCI is George Berkeley, known for his dictum “esse est percipi” (to be is to be perceived). While Berkeley’s notion of immaterialism — arguing that objects only exist insofar as they are perceived by a mind — may seem remote from product design, I have come to see in it a crucial insight for modern interface development. In many ways, software interfaces are intangible; their reality is constructed in part by our interactions, and in part by the intangible lines of code that exist as signals in hardware. The “thing” we call an app or a website might not have any physical form beyond the screen’s pixels and the ephemeral data that animates them.

Berkeley’s emphasis on perception reminds me that the user’s experience of a product is often the entire reality of that product from their perspective. If users perceive a piece of software as buggy, slow, or clunky — even if it’s well-coded under the hood — their perceived reality is negative. The intangible nature of software means that its “material” reality (the code) is only truly validated when a mind interacts with it. This suggests that we as designers and developers should recognize that in the user’s reality, aesthetics, usability, and performance are all inseparable. Moreover, this immaterial nature of software opens up new dimensions for conceptualizing design — especially as we move into augmented and virtual realities, where entire “worlds” exist in the intangible fabric of code and imagination.

Current State of Product Design and HCI : Where Are We Now?

I believe we’re living in a golden age of user experience — one where design is no longer an afterthought but a core differentiator in many industries. However, it’s also an age characterized by potential oversights. Let me break down what I see as key issues in the current state of product design and HCI.

The Triumph of Minimalism and Its Discontents

Minimalism has taken center stage in digital interfaces, influenced heavily by big players like Apple, Google’s Material Design, and the broader shift toward “flat” aesthetics. The key advantage of minimalism is clarity. It reduces visual noise, allows content to shine, and in theory, places user tasks front and center. But from a philosophical angle, minimalism can sometimes drift into an impoverished aesthetic experience if it becomes formulaic. One might recall Kant’s emphasis on “purposiveness without purpose” in aesthetic judgment : a minimalist design might appear purposeful, but can fail to spark the deeper pleasure of discovery if it’s too stripped down.

Data-Driven Everything

We currently sit in a landscape dominated by metrics. Eye-tracking heatmaps, A/B tests, and funnel analyses form the backbone of many design decisions. This scientific approach to refining user interfaces is undoubtedly powerful, mirroring Hume’s pragmatic emphasis on experience and empiricism. Yet there is a danger in missing the intangible aspects — the intangible aesthetic resonances — that can’t be easily measured. An interface might score brilliantly on usability tests and still leave users feeling emotionally disengaged. Philosophically, Hume might remind us that sentiments cannot be reduced to purely quantitative measures. Finding the right balance between data-driven refinement and intuitive leaps is a major challenge for modern product teams.

Ubiquity of Touch and the Rise of Multimodality

Touchscreens have become the standard method of interaction for billions of people worldwide. This transformation has been both revolutionary and limiting. While haptic feedback and gesture-based controls have opened up new realms of intuitive design, one might argue that we’ve become overly reliant on the “flatness” of glass. Designers and researchers in HCI are increasingly exploring alternative modes : voice interfaces, tangible computing, brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), and immersive realities (AR/VR). Each new medium expands the possibilities for aesthetic experience — fusing intangible code with new forms of tangible or semi-tangible perception.

Ethical Imperatives and User Agency

One pressing matter I can’t overlook in the current state of product design is the ethical dimension. As technology becomes ever more integrated into daily life — mediating our social interactions, work, finances, and health — designers wield substantial power. We shape not just experiences but behaviors and even social norms. We must continuously interrogate the power we hold. Adhering to a sense of moral responsibility, reminiscent of Kant’s deontological ethics, compels me to consider the universal implications of each design choice — asking whether it respects users as ends in themselves, rather than as mere metrics in a conversion funnel.

Looking Forward : Future Possibilities and Philosophical Visions

Blending the Physical and the Digital

With augmented reality (AR) and mixed reality (MR) technologies, the boundary between physical and digital is becoming increasingly porous. If I reflect on Berkeley’s immaterialism, I see a future where entire “objects” can be conjured at will — design elements that exist purely in code but appear anchored in our physical space. This shift challenges us to think of product design not just as screens or devices, but as orchestrations of intangible phenomena. From an aesthetic perspective, the product’s “form” extends across a dynamic interplay of digital and real-world contexts.

For instance, imagine a collaborative design tool that overlays 3D prototypes onto physical surfaces in real time. This is no longer the realm of sci-fi; we already have glimpses with advanced AR headsets. The philosophical challenge lies in ensuring these experiences remain both cognitively intuitive (Hume’s sense of immediate sentiment) and aesthetically harmonious (Kant’s sense of disinterested pleasure and Burke’s sense of the sublime).

AI-Driven Personalization

Artificial intelligence — especially machine learning — promises hyper-personalized experiences. Products can adapt in real time to user preferences, emotional states, and usage patterns, forging a more intimate relationship between user and interface. On the one hand, this resonates with Hume’s subjectivism : each user’s experience is unique, so why not adapt the product to match that uniqueness? On the other, it raises questions of identity, agency, and privacy : to what extent should the user be aware of the AI’s behind-the-scenes manipulations?

There is also the aesthetic question of how an AI-driven system might dynamically alter an interface’s look and feel. Could we see a renaissance of “playful” design, where the shapes, colors, and modes of interaction evolve with each user’s personal tastes — like a truly living piece of art? The potential for co-creation between human and artificial intelligence in design holds enormous promise. Yet philosophically, it might challenge the concept of a stable “object” that a broad community can collectively judge.

Embodied Interaction and the Return to the Physical

In parallel to the digital revolution, there’s a growing fascination with reintroducing tactile and physical feedback into our computational experiences — reminiscent of how vinyl records have seen a resurgence in the age of streaming. Haptic interfaces, flexible screens, shape-shifting materials (in emerging research labs), and specialized hardware that emulates textures or weights could lead to an entirely new dimension in product design.

At a conceptual level, these developments encourage us to revisit Edmund Burke’s idea of the sublime — a sense of awe at how advanced technology can physically morph, or how it can trigger new sensations. This direction might also bring us closer to bridging the ephemeral with the tangible, merging the intangible code with real-world physicality in ways that are deeply aesthetic and cognitively seamless.

The Ethics of Persuasion and Nudging

As the future of product design increasingly focuses on personalized interactions, we find ourselves treading new ethical ground. “Nudge” theory, popularized in behavioral economics, suggests that subtle design cues can guide user behavior. While it can be beneficial — helping people save more money, reduce harmful habits, or adopt healthier behaviors — there’s a potential risk in overstepping boundaries into manipulation. Reflecting on Kantian ethics, I remind myself that the user must remain an autonomous moral agent. Any design that threatens to subvert or diminish that autonomy needs rigorous ethical scrutiny.

In a world where product design is not just about selling goods but shaping entire ecosystems of behavior, the philosophical underpinnings of aesthetic judgments become newly relevant. The sense of disinterested pleasure that Kant describes can stand as a reminder : design can and should offer experiences that are valuable in themselves, not purely manipulative or utilitarian.

Integrating Philosophical Insights into Daily Design Practice

How do I take these lofty philosophical concepts and integrate them into the grind of daily product development and HCI research? Here are a few practices I’ve found helpful :

1. Aesthetic Audits : Before finalizing a design, I step back from functional concerns and assess the interface aesthetically. Am I experiencing any form of delight, surprise, or curiosity? Or is it purely utilitarian? This moment of “disinterested” assessment, inspired by Kant, ensures that I consider aesthetics as its own dimension of value.
2. Dialogic Feedback Loops : Hume reminds me that taste is subjective and socially influenced. Therefore, I extend testing beyond a narrow set of typical users. I’ll have dialogues with diverse user groups — people of different cultural backgrounds, age groups, or professions — to glean how the design resonates. This inclusive approach reveals aesthetic sentiments that may not emerge from purely homogenous user sets.
3. Moments of Sublimity : Drawing on Burke’s distinction, I specifically hunt for “wow” moments that might evoke something akin to the sublime. It could be a micro-interaction that’s so elegant it triggers amazement, or a feature that feels revolutionary. These micro-moments of astonishment can differentiate a product in a crowded marketplace.
4. Metaphorical Explorations : Taking a page from Berkeley’s “esse est percipi,” I remind myself that digital products often have no “objective” form. Everything from the color palette to the shape of icons is a metaphorical scaffold. Engaging with design in a more playful, conceptual way — testing new metaphors for old functions — can lead to innovative solutions that break from the status quo.
5. Ethical Checkpoints : Borrowing from Kantian deontology, I introduce explicit ethical checkpoints in the design process. If we’re adding a feature that collects user data, how do we ensure this respects their autonomy? If we’re implementing a nudge, does it enhance user well-being or does it risk becoming manipulative? By reflecting on these questions systematically, we anchor the design in a moral framework.

Concluding Thoughts : Beauty, Interaction, and Our Shared Human Future

As I reflect on this journey — from my initial curiosities about the intangible “feeling” of a product to deeper engagements with philosophical thought — I realize that design is far more than a practical discipline. It is a conversation between human values, technological possibilities, and the timeless quest for beauty and meaning. Each design is, in some sense, an embodiment of our collective aspirations — how we wish to feel, how we wish to interact, and who we hope to become.

At a practical level, this means we cannot divorce product design from the moral, cultural, and personal contexts in which it unfolds. Philosophers like Kant, Burke, Hume, and Berkeley remind us that aesthetic experience is deeply woven into the fabric of our perceptions, sentiments, and rational faculties. We shouldn’t view beauty as an afterthought; rather, it is a potent force that invites us into experiences of harmony, awe, or exploration. Even in the ephemeral realm of digital interfaces, beauty and aesthetics anchor our sentiments, shaping how we judge a product’s worth and whether we allow it into the intimate spaces of our lives.

Looking toward the future — one characterized by immersive realities, AI-driven personalization, shape-shifting materials, and ethical quandaries about user autonomy — we should recall that design is ultimately a means of structuring human experience. Whether we’re designing hardware that nestles into your palm or intangible software that redefines how you perceive reality, the same philosophical questions apply. What is it for something to be “beautiful”? How do we handle the subjectivity of taste? In what ways do our perceptions shape reality — or does reality shape our perceptions? How can a design evoke awe without overwhelming, or remain minimal without losing its expressive qualities?

By grappling with these questions, we elevate our craft and remain stewards of a design tradition that seeks not just efficiency, but also the flourishing of human potential and creativity. In the end, the interplay between product design, human-computer interaction, and aesthetics is a testament to our broader human endeavor : to make sense of our reality, to bring forth objects and experiences that resonate with our deepest intuitions, and to ultimately participate in the continuous creation of the world around us.

I’ll continue to explore these intersections, drawing on the thoughts of Kant, Burke, Hume, and Berkeley to inspire new avenues. With each new design project, each new collaboration, and each new technological breakthrough, I believe we inch closer toward a future where products are not only tools, but also mirrors in which we see our better, more creative, and more compassionate selves reflected. And that, to me, is the ultimate triumph of weaving philosophy and aesthetics into product design — a truly humanized technology that invites us to marvel, to question, and to grow.

In my mind, that is what makes every new interface, every new product, and every new experience an ongoing philosophical adventure — an exploration of the ever-shifting boundaries of what it means to be human in an era of intertwined beauty, thought, and interaction.

Thanks for dropping by !

---

Disclaimer : Everything written above, I owe to the great minds I've encountered and the voices I’ve heard along the way.